Eligibility assessment
A documented go/no-go review against the Breakthrough Devices Program criteria and the planned marketing pathway.
Breakthrough Device Designation
For devices addressing serious or irreversibly debilitating conditions, a well-supported designation request can provide earlier and more frequent FDA interaction.
Best suited to
Scope and deliverables
The request must do more than describe novel technology. It must connect the condition, current standard of care, clinical benefit and statutory criteria.
A documented go/no-go review against the Breakthrough Devices Program criteria and the planned marketing pathway.
A clear account of disease severity, limitations of available alternatives and the patient problem the device addresses.
A structured argument for more effective diagnosis or treatment using available clinical, analytical and literature evidence.
A precise description of the technology, users, population, workflow, indication and proposed regulatory pathway.
Relevant literature, preliminary performance data, comparative evidence and a credible development and validation plan.
Complete application drafting, internal quality review, client approval, eSTAR assembly where applicable and filing confirmation.
Delivery plan
Review the condition, proposed indication, technology, alternatives, development stage and available supporting evidence.
Confirm intended use and build the unmet-need, clinical-benefit and statutory-criteria strategy.
Write the device description, eligibility rationale, evidence narrative and proposed development plan.
Resolve consolidated comments, perform quality review, prepare attachments and submit the request to FDA.
Guarantee boundaries
What we need from your team
Regulations, standards and guidance considered
Frequently asked questions
No. Predetics commits to preparing and filing the accepted request in two weeks. FDA separately reviews the request and controls the designation decision timeline.
No. Designation provides programme benefits such as prioritised interaction, but the device must still satisfy all requirements for its eventual 510(k), De Novo or PMA.
We explain why the current case is weak and identify whether stronger evidence, a revised indication, STeP or the standard regulatory pathway is more appropriate.
Companies may disclose a granted designation, subject to accurate communications. It can be a useful milestone, but it should never be presented as FDA clearance.