Qualification and Rule 11 classification
Intended-purpose analysis, device and software boundaries, classification rationale and documentation of applicable MDR rules.
EU MDR CE Marking
We help medical device software manufacturers establish qualification and classification, select the conformity-assessment route, and build lifecycle technical documentation under Regulation (EU) 2017/745.
Selected clients
Healthcare teams we have supported


















Scope and deliverables
The manufacturer remains legally responsible for conformity. We support the strategy, evidence and documentation; we do not act as a notified body or issue certificates.
Intended-purpose analysis, device and software boundaries, classification rationale and documentation of applicable MDR rules.
Applicable annex route, QMS and notified-body needs, EU Authorized Representative and importer interfaces, timing and dependency map.
Annex I applicability, evidence references, harmonized standards and common specifications, with justified treatment of gaps or alternatives.
Device description, design and manufacturing information, risk management, product verification and validation, software and labeling evidence.
Clinical evaluation planning and reports, PMCF strategy, usability engineering and alignment between claims and demonstrated performance.
PMS plan, reporting structures, vigilance and trend processes, registration inputs, Declaration of Conformity and controlled CE-marking checklist.
Ways to work together
Coordinate route, evidence and technical documentation through conformity-assessment readiness.
Independent review of device status, Rule 11 class, current file and prioritized remediation plan.
Interpret findings, establish root document gaps and prepare controlled evidence-based responses.
How it works
Confirm intended purpose, qualification, classification and economic operators.
Connect GSPRs, standards, risks, claims and evidence ownership.
Prepare Annex II and III documentation and challenge traceability and consistency.
Support notified-body review and transition the file into PMS and change control.
Regulations, standards and guidance considered
Frequently asked questions
No. Validly classified class I devices that are not sterile, measuring or reusable surgical instruments may generally self-declare. Class IIa, IIb and III devices require notified-body involvement, subject to the selected conformity route.
It considers the purpose of information used for diagnostic or therapeutic decisions and the consequence of those decisions, plus software that monitors physiological processes. Software outside those provisions may fall into class I. Product-specific wording and clinical context matter.
Annex II covers device description, information supplied, design and manufacturing, GSPR evidence, risk management and verification and validation. Annex III covers PMS documentation. The file should remain current and cross-referenced, not be a static submission binder.
No. ISO 13485 supports quality-system conformity, but CE marking also requires device-specific conformity assessment, technical and clinical evidence, PMS arrangements, economic-operator duties and a Declaration of Conformity.
We can help define the needed designation scope and support readiness and interactions. The manufacturer contracts with an appropriately designated notified body; Predetics is not a notified body and cannot issue an MDR certificate.
No. The manufacturer and, where required, notified body complete the legal conformity process. Review findings, evidence gaps and regulatory changes can affect timing and outcome.
Start with the product you have